|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
412
|
Posted - 2012.07.16 02:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:On that point why are T2BPO not being seeded onto Serenity or any more onto Tranq? I mean T2BPO's are great yes? Oh wait no they suck and are in dire need of removal.
Nobody here's said they're "Great," just that they're "Not a Problem."
If there were a way to turn back time and not have released them, that would be fine. But removing them at this point would cause problems without solving any actual problems.
Because, again, they're not a problem anymore.
If Serenity's so much better, go play there, and stop bothering us. -RubyPorto
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
444
|
Posted - 2012.07.18 17:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
TheGunslinger42 wrote:I'm not even an industrial player
The actual industrialists here keep pointing out that T2 BPOs don't actually cause the problems Brewlar thinks they do. -RubyPorto
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
445
|
Posted - 2012.07.18 23:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Cap James Tkirk wrote:as an inventor they may not "waste money inventing" but they are limited to that one print and can only pump out so many items per day, look at t2 invuls if bpo owner could meet the demands the item would be a few 100k not 2ish m a pop They can't copy those BPOs?
You really, really need to do your homework.
Copying a T2 BPO generally (I think it's universal, but I haven't looked at every T2 BPO) takes longer per run then manufacturing from it. And it costs materials.
For instance, copying a T2 Invuln BPO takes 5hrs per run, and costs 30 data sheets and .5 of a R.Db - Ishukone, so ~100k Isk per copy. Manufacturing takes ~3hrs per run.
There are maybe a half dozen reasons to copy a T2 BPO. Running on multiple lines isn't one of them. -RubyPorto
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
446
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 00:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Akita T wrote:You have all but conclusively proven you barely know how things work with regards to T2 invention/production, and you haven't shown a lot of signs of being capable of understanding the economic implications of the things you're trying to argue, whereas people with various degrees of proven track records argue the exact opposite thing of what you're trying to imply would be better. Oh, "you don't have degree in economics" card. 
No, it's the "you don't have the first clue what you're talking about, and every claim you have yet made is demonstrably false" card.
Nobody's rebutting your claims by calling into question your credentials, we're rebutting your claims with facts.
For instance, you seem to think that you must put BPOs in a POS to copy them at the POS. That is demonstrably false. You seem to think that there is some value in copying T2 BPOs for manufacture. That is also demonstrably false.
You also seem to think that it's valid to skip right to a new claim when your last one gets trashed. That's called Moving the Goalposts. -RubyPorto
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
446
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 00:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:For instance, you seem to think that you must put BPOs in a POS to copy them at the POS. That is demonstrably false. Do you even know how long it takes to get 10.0 standing with faction, 10.0 sec status and moon in hisec? Especially with pure industry trained character with very little combat skills.
1. It is impossible to get 10.0 faction standing, Impossible to get 10.0 Sec Status (it's even hard to get past 5.0).
2. You don't need 10.0 Faction standing, you need 7.0 faction standing.
3. You can easily buy a corp with 5.0 Faction standing, because anchoring a POS only requires that your Corp have a certain standing.
4. Sec status is irrelevant.
5. You still haven't admitted that you were wrong about BPOs having to go into the POS, instead, you just moved the goalpost again. -RubyPorto
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
446
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 01:29:00 -
[6] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Ore Bunny wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Ok...
- I buy a corp with 5.0 faction standing - I get my research alt in (let's say this character has 2.0 standing with said faction) - Corp's standing with that faction will drop.
maaate, I think your pedals are going to fast to see it, but it looks like they are going backwards  NPC factions/corps standings toward a player corporation are calculated in this way:
You take the standing (without skills included) of each corporation member (towards the NPC entity in question) on an active subscribing account, add them all up and then divide by the number of members that have the standing already in their character sheet. The ones who do not have a standing towards the entity are not taken into account. The standings will update to the avarage after every downtime.http://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Standings_mechanics#NPC_Faction_standings_towards_Player_corporations
That's not relevant at all.
Once the POS is anchored, your standings don't matter.
Tell me again how you have to put BPOs in a POS to use them? -RubyPorto
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
448
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Ok, let's use T2 invul BPO again because you people like it so much.
Only 100 runs per T2 BPC. What are chances that inventor even gets 100 run T2 BPC? Usually close to 10 runs per T2 BPC. Akita T owns T2 BPO and can do as many runs as she has materials for.
Invention takes time and money just to get that 10 run BPC.
It takes 500 hours to make a 100 run BPC from a T2 Invuln BPO. It would have taken ~250-300 hours to build 100 T2 Invulns from that BPO.
It takes much less than 500 hours to invent and build 100 runs of T2 Invulns, especially since you can run more than one job at a time.
Tell me again how BPOs have to be left in POSes to research and Anchoring POSes requires 10.0 Faction Standing and 10.0 Sec Status. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
448
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:It takes 500 hours to make a 100 run BPC from a T2 Invuln BPO. It would have taken ~250-300 hours to build 100 T2 Invulns from that BPO.
It takes much less than 500 hours to invent and build 100 runs of T2 Invulns, especially since you can run more than one job at a time. And you can't do that with T2 BPOs? There's like 5000 T2 invul BPOs in the game.
There most certainly are not 5000 of them and even if there were, making a BPC from that BPO takes 5 hours per Run, or 50 hours per 10 run BPC. An inventor can make a 10 run BPC in 12 hours working on one line with T1 BPCs purchased from the market or run off on an alt.
T2 BPOs certainly provide some advantage over inventors. None of that advantage lies in copying them.
Pipa Porto wrote:Tell me again how BPOs have to be left in POSes to research and Anchoring POSes requires 10.0 Faction Standing and 10.0 Sec Status.
Guides.[/quote]
You either found the world's most unreasonably terrible guides, or you're lying again. My bet is on the latter. Cite your sources. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
448
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 18:59:00 -
[9] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:You either found the world's most unreasonably terrible guides, or you're lying again. My bet is on the latter. Cite your sources. I never said I have office in NYC. Getting one would cost billions. Large POS already costs 1-2 billion a month to run. And that's labs offline.
Your idiotic assessment of the cost isn't relative to the question. Tell me again how you have to put your BPOs in the POS and require 10.0 Faction standing and 10.0 Sec status to anchor.
20k ISK * 40 blocks/hr *168hrs/wk * 4 weeks per lunar month = 537 600 000 ISK EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
448
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:05:00 -
[10] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:that, plus 5000 T2 invul BPOs in the game ade my day, thank you   Any reason why I should use something else other than large deathstar/****star in hisec?
That's not actually relevant, but the reason is that you have 24hrs to change from a peacetime Labs only to a wartime Guns setup.
Quote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:btw. is around 20 BPO's per item Are you sure devs don't have more of them? I've heard they play this game too.
If you have evidence of CCP Dev misconduct, please send it to CCP Sreegs so he can have a very pointy conversation with that Dev.
A while ago, someone got some information on what CCP employees did when they played. Not many of them were industrialists (probably because stopping yourself from acting on insider information would be a tricky line to walk). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
448
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Your idiotic assessment of the cost isn't relative to the question. Tell me again how you have to put your BPOs in the POS and require 10.0 Faction standing and 10.0 Sec status to anchor. No office in NYC = no corp hangar = BPO must be in POS.
When did we start talking about NYC?
An Office in a nice quiet system is like 10m ISK a month.
Just because you've decided to be an idiot doesn't mean you have to put your BPOs in the POS.
And tell me again how you need a 10.0 Faction standing and 10.0 Sec Status to anchor it. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
449
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:17:00 -
[12] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:And tell me again how you need a 10.0 Faction standing and 10.0 Sec Status to anchor it. In 1.0 system you need those.
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHA
You can't anchor POSes in a 1.0 system. Even if you could, the Sec level of the system doesn't really matter in HS because you need a wardec to reasonably kill a POS.
Tell me again how the BPOs have to go into a POS and how Sec status is at all relevant? And tell me again how copying a T2 BPO is a worthwhile idea EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
450
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 19:25:00 -
[13] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Tell me again how the BPOs have to go into a POS and how Sec status is at all relevant? If POS is in system without stations or CORP DOESN'T have OFFICE in that system, BPOs must be in POS. What part of that you don't understand? And how there's towers in 0.8 and 0.9 systems then?
The part where you'd be stupid enough to put yourself in that position.
And there aren't. .5, .6, and .7 can have towers in HS. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
452
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 20:12:00 -
[14] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1653262#post1653262
Quote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:OMG have yo uever seen a POS in a 0.8 systems? Or did these guides tell you that? I can see all nearby towers in d-scan. I've also seen few in 0.8 and 0.9 systems just by warping around.
I'll second the offer of 1b for the location of an Anchored POS in a .8 or .9 system. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
452
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 22:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:I'd be happy if invention was buffed beyond T2BP or if invention actually made items beyond T2 ie T2-B items that had slightly better stats or fitting requirements than current T2. This would allow bitter vets to keep their free hand out while making them irrelevant for inventors.
Invention is a far better investment than T2 BPOs.
Give me the 100b that a Hulk BPO costs (and the 8b of materials to produce 32 Hulks for the month) and I'll make much more than the 2.5b a month that the Hulk BPO can return (assuming ME 100, PE 50).
For instance, in the same time period, with the same capital (110b), I could run 2 characters inventing and building Hulks, making 520 Hulks for around a 14 Billion Isk profit (accounting for invention and Plex costs). (Actually, I run out of materials after 410 Hulks and a profit of 11 Billion ISK, so the month ends 5 days early)
That's 4 times the profit of the BPO.
If I owned a T2 BPO the first thing I'd do is sell it. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
452
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 22:24:00 -
[16] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:If I owned a T2 BPO the first thing I'd do is sell it. Why? You would get huge profit using it.
You could try reading the rest of my post.
I could make 2.5b building 30 Hulks a month with a BPO, or I could use the same capital and make 10-15b building a few hundred through invention. Or, I could use it for even more lucrative investments.
2.5% a month is pretty crappy profit for Eve. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
452
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 23:23:00 -
[17] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:You could try reading the rest of my post.
I could make 2.5b building 30 Hulks a month with a BPO, or I could use the same capital and make 10-15b building a few hundred through invention. Or, I could use it for even more lucrative investments.
2.5% a month is pretty crappy profit for Eve. That's same profit I get. Could be higher if I could get materials faster to build more. You calculated it wrong.
No, I didn't.
A T2 BPO can run through 8b worth of materials in a month producing some 30 Hulks. Total profit for 110b invested, 2.5b.
An Inventor can churn through 110b worth of materials in that same month, producing some few hundred Hulks. Total profit for 110b invested, some 11b.
Just because you're bad at something doesn't mean it's broken. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
452
|
Posted - 2012.07.19 23:32:00 -
[18] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Akita T wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Could be higher if I could get materials faster to build more. Here's a "novel" thought : how about your BUY THEM FROM THE MARKET ? Even less profit at these prices.
11b a month sounds like a pretty good profit to me. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
452
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 03:17:00 -
[19] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Akita T wrote:If a big portion of your profit actually comes from manufacturing components, why do you even bother with invention at all to begin with and not just scale up your component production capabilities instead ? If I want to manufacture most of the components, why I'm not allowed to do that?
Where did Akita say you weren't allowed to? She said that it's not the most efficient use of your time. If you're not worried about the most efficient use of your time, and prefer to do things less efficiently, you don't get to complain when people reduce your profits by being more efficient than you. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
452
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 19:16:00 -
[20] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Cheeba Don wrote:T2 bpos are perfect for eve as they stand now. A seductively expensive collectors item, some of which offer decent returns on investment. So, T2 BPO owners can compete against inventors after all. I said it a long time ago...
Point to one T2 BPO that offers anything like a good return on its investment. Multiple years to recoup the ISK invested is not anything like good.
Titan BPOs used to be good when the BPCs sold for 20b. Now that they sell for 8b, they're better than most T2 BPOs, but they're not really good investments (that's why you see them up for sale).
T2 BPOs used to be a great investment before invention because they were the bottleneck of the T2 manufacturing process. Now, because of invention, the Bottlenecks in the moon goo, and they're pretty terrible investments.
They may be able to compete on unit cost, but the number of ships and modules with demand low enough that that matters is tiny. Things like EAFs and T2 Plates have their prices dominated by BPO owners, but they'd not be worth inventing anyway because nobody uses them. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
452
|
Posted - 2012.07.20 19:17:00 -
[21] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:The ability to lock a blue print and still use it needs an urgent nerf in fact allowing a pos to produce from bp's inside a station is completely stupid too. So, basically, you just want to remove the remote research and manufacture skills, and remove the ability to lock down stuff, and nothing else.
Brewlar hates Pie so much he wants to ban Oven Mitts so that Bakers can't do any work. Just to make sure they don't bake Pie. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
457
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:35:00 -
[22] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:the Bottlenecks in the moon goo, and they're pretty terrible investments. Last time I checked Tech holders make profit from every Hulk destroyed even though they pay for it.
This is a T2 BPO whine thread, not an OTEC whine thread. Keep your goalpost moving on topic.
The possibility that players might have a financial motive to put a bounty on a class of ship isn't relevant to the fact that T2 BPOs are horrible investments.
If you think they're too profitable, then there's an easy way to deal with it. Buy one and get rich. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
457
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:44:00 -
[23] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:This is a T2 BPO whine thread, not an OTEC whine thread. Keep your goalpost moving on topic.
The possibility that players might have a financial motive to put a bounty on a class of ship isn't relevant to the fact that T2 BPOs are horrible investments.
If you think they're too profitable, then there's an easy way to deal with it. Buy one and get rich. Most important reason for Hulkageddon was to create those profits to Hulk BPO owners. It's very likely that Heicity and Goons owns most of the Hulk BPOs.
You tried this stupid argument before. A Hulk BPO is a terrible investment. It earns maybe 3b ISK a month on over 100b ISK of capital. Besides that, Hulk pricing is totally dominated by inventors, not BPO owners.
If you think T2 BPOs are too profitable and easy, why haven't you bought one? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
457
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:49:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:You tried this stupid argument before. A Hulk BPO is a terrible investment. It earns maybe 3b ISK a month on over 100b ISK of capital. Besides that, Hulk pricing is totally dominated by inventors, not BPO owners. Not if you own like 10 of them.
Ok, 30b ISK a month on 1 Trillion Isk of Capital.
And that produces 300 Hulks a month to Jita's consumption of ~2500 Hulks a month. Still dominated by Inventors. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
457
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:51:00 -
[25] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Akita T wrote:Can you make up your mind ? Was it Hulk BPOs or tech moons ? Because the INCOME from a single tech moon overshadows the PROFIT of a single Hulk BPO, badly. And there's hundreds of tech moons but only dozens of Hulk BPOs. Clueless as always? Goonies own all Tech moons and most of the Hulk BPOs. 1 + 1 = 2?
Why in the world would you want to tie up 100 Billion is in a Hulk BPO when you have a Tech moon? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
457
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:53:00 -
[26] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Ok, 30b ISK a month on 1 Trillion Isk of Capital still terrible. They get trillion from their moons every month.
Yes. And what in that Trillion Isk a month income would that make them take stupid pills and invest in Hulk BPOs instead of preparing for a future Tech nerf? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
457
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 00:57:00 -
[27] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Yes. And what in that Trillion Isk a month income would that make them take stupid pills and invest in Hulk BPOs instead of preparing for a future Tech nerf? They're planning on taking all Cobalt moons. They already own some of them.
That's not an answer to my question. What in their Trillion Isk a month income would make them decide to invest in Hulk BPOs? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
457
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 01:20:00 -
[28] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:That's not an answer to my question. What in their Trillion Isk a month income would make them decide to invest in Hulk BPOs? They've known about the nerf a month or two. You asked why they would buy T2 BPOs they already own instead of taking all Cobalt moons from other alliances. First: they don't need to buy those BPOs because they already own them. Second: they are already taking all Cobalt moons from other alliances and have been doing quite some time. But of course you should know about this or you're clueless about what your alliance is doing.
1. You keep confusing Sniggwaffe (Alliance: Your Votes Don't Count) with other alliances.
2. Do you understand what opportunity cost is? The 100 Billion Isk each Hulk BPO represents is better invested in any number of other things. Why would they keep it invested in T2 BPOs?
3. If you have any evidence to suggest that Devs have leaked information inappropriately to anyone, please send that information to CCP's IA department. Otherwise baseless accusations of misconduct are annoying. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
457
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 01:35:00 -
[29] - Quote
I believe that they're referring to knowing that Tech would be nerfed at some point in the future. Some people made some educated guesses about what the nerf would look like. Those guesses being right doesn't mean that they knew anything.
This still doesn't explain why they'd ever bother to invest in T2 BPOs. Stop trying to drive the goalposts away from the topic into your insane conspiratorial ramblings. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 19:38:00 -
[30] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Akita T wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:No body would moan if CCP sold T2BPO's for 100 billion isk You mean, other than just about any active inventor, which are the people you're supposedly claiming you're trying to aid ? You're kind of contradicting yourself. Every additional T2 BPO lowers inventor market share, down to the point where no invention would be profitable anymore, and eventually even T2 BPO ownership would barely be worth more than T1 BPO ownership. I was talking about originally instead of the lottery not now. Introducing more T2BPO's would be stupid.
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:I don't care if a T2BPO is worth billions I'd like to trade in my RP for one please.
Which is it? Are you moaning about not being able to "Trade in" your RP for a BPO (in a way that was never possible in the first place)? Or are you moaning that you didn't start playing EVE early enough.
If you think T2 BPOs are overpowered, why haven't you bought any? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |
|

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
459
|
Posted - 2012.07.21 21:49:00 -
[31] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Uris Vitgar wrote:T2 BPOs obviously don't belong in the current system, frankly I'm amazed that there is any support for their continued existence at all. They are a relic of a bygone age. The problem is not "should T2 BPOs be removed", it's how- bear in mind CCP's general policy of not taking away what they have given Or, in other words, you CAN'T remove them, so the only reasonable alternative is to make them be worth less, earn less profits, and be less advantageous compared to invention.
Happily, CCP just announced a buff to Invention compared to BPOs by introducing Tech alchemy. They're also planning on giving underused T2 Items a reason to be used (T2 Plates), reducing the number of items that BPOs control the price. Hopefully they'll buff it again soon by reducing the click festival. After that, I don't think there are any more low hanging fruits, but then, BPOs do still serve a useful purpose by providing a supply of those items that have little demand at prices lower than what inventors would have to charge to account for the slow sales. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
461
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 18:53:00 -
[32] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Akita T wrote:Or, in other words, you CAN'T remove them The fact that you don't want them removed doesn't mean it can't be done.
Context, it matters.
Uris Vitgar wrote:bear in mind CCP's general policy of not taking away what they have given
Quote:Pipa Porto wrote:Happily, CCP just announced a buff to Invention compared to BPOs by introducing Tech alchemy. No, that will be buff for T2 BPO owners.
BPO owners have an advantage on material costs. When material costs decrease, that advantage decreases. Cheap inputs reduce the advantage that waste conscious manufacturers (BPO owners) have over wasteful manufacturers (Inventors).
Reducing the price of inputs is a relative buff to inventors. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
461
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 19:00:00 -
[33] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:I agree it's highly unlikely that CCP will stop handing out massive advantages to pet players.
Got any evidence of Dev misconduct, please send it to CCP's IA department. If you have and they haven't dealt with it, you might try the media.
T2 BPOs stopped being seeded like 5 years ago, and you have, as yet, provided no evidence to suggest that the Lottery was performed unfairly. You've also failed to show how T2 BPOs are a "massive advantage" since they represent an enormous amount of capital investment (no matter how they were acquired, the opportunity cost of not selling them is functionally equivalent to the opportunity cost of buying them) for a piddling little profit.
T2 BPOs used to be massively OP, allowing organizations to easily monopolize T2 items. Then invention came, and T2 BPOs have been marginalized to the point that they only affect the markets of those few items so unpopular that BPOs can fill the demand. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
461
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 19:04:00 -
[34] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:As T2 production costs isk in materials so no it could not crash or people would simply reprocess items for materials.
Yes, reprocessing your T2 stuff for the Morphite content. You have no idea what you're talking about, do you?
The BPC idea (depending on how it was implemented) could easily crash the T2 markets by allowing former BPO owners to essentially run their BPO in parallel, which would give them an enormous advantage over Inventors until the BPCs run out, flooding the market with T2 items at low prices. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
461
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 19:53:00 -
[35] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:BPO owners have an advantage on material costs. When material costs decrease, that advantage decreases. Cheap inputs reduce the advantage that waste conscious manufacturers (BPO owners) have over wasteful manufacturers (Inventors).
Reducing the price of inputs is a relative buff to inventors. It will help T2 BPO owners more. CCP is going to remove only disadvantage from T2 BPO. T2 BPO owners will get more profit because material costs will be reduced.
T2 BPOs disadvantages are their immense capital cost and their inability to run in parallel. This doesn't touch those.
It reduces the value of their efficiency advantage, since the material cost will represent a smaller proportion of the invention dominated price (and prices will be lower).
If you believe otherwise, show your reasoning and prove it. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
461
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 21:13:00 -
[36] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:It reduces the value of their efficiency advantage, since the material cost will represent a smaller proportion of the invention dominated price (and prices will be lower). Why only invention dominated prices? Why it doesn't affect material costs for T2 BPO owners?
The pricing of most T2 items is determined by invention costs. That's what it means for the price to be dominated by inventors.
It does, but since they use less, they get less benefit from material cost going down than inventors. Lower material prices reduce the difference in production costs between inventors and BPO owners. Since that difference is the entire economic value of a BPO, reducing the difference reduces the value of that BPO.
For items whose market is dominated by BPOs (the ****** ones that nobody would bother inventing in the first place because there's no demand), prices will simply drop and BPOs will loose a little bit of ground to inventors, since lower prices often leads to increased demand.
If you think Tech Alchemy helps BPO owners more than Inventors, please, show your reasoning. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
462
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 21:50:00 -
[37] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:It does, but since they use less, they get less benefit from material cost going down than inventors. Lower material prices reduce the difference in production costs between inventors and BPO owners. Since that difference is the entire economic value of a BPO, reducing the difference reduces the value of that BPO. Why you keep mentioning the cost of BPO on every post? Like it's very difficult to get billions for nullbears. For example there was one big alliance that got 15 trillion (or something like that) removed from them not that long ago. If BPO owners need less materials / module or ship they will get really big bonus to their profit.
Because having lots of money doesn't mean you're stupid. Opportunity cost is opportunity cost no matter how much money you have.
BPO owners materials cost decreases, sure. But inventors material cost decreases more, shrinking the gap between BPOs and invention. Since that Gap is the entire value of the BPO, that means the BPOs are worth less than they were before.
In other words, the BPO owners cost to produce drops, but the price of the item drops by a larger amount (because the price is set by inventors), reducing the BPO's profits. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
462
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 22:52:00 -
[38] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:In other words, the BPO owners cost to produce drops, but the price of the item drops by a larger amount (because the price is set by inventors), reducing the BPO's profits. T2 invuls for 50k? Yeah, not going to happen.
What the hell are you talking about?
If you think that Tech alchemy will help BPO owners more than inventors, show exactly how. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
462
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 22:55:00 -
[39] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:The cost of obtaining a BPO was 0 isk to a couple of billion ISK in RP. Never forget this fact. If T2BPO's were introduced at the cost of billions of isk and were sold at a set rate by CCP there would be no complaints.
CCP has removed all worth out of the EVE economy by introducing items that are worth billions of ISK with out billions of isk worth of effort being expanded by the players.
Then quit. Goodbye.
The lottery isn't relevant to the discussion of removing BPOs unless you have a time machine. They're commodities on the market just like any other, and they have a pretty terrible rate of return.
If you think they're overpowered now, put your money where your mouth is and Buy one to prove it. If you're still complaining about a game mechanic that stopped existing 5 YEARS ago, shut up and leave. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
462
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 23:19:00 -
[40] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:What the hell are you talking about? You mentioned that price of T2 modules/ships will drop a lot... Pipa Porto wrote:If you think that Tech alchemy will help BPO owners more than inventors, show exactly how. First of all, you don't have to invent anything. That's already huge advantage. Second, price of moon materials will drop noticeably. (Needed for T2 production). Third, T2 BPO owners need less materials to produce T2 module/ship.
I said that the price would drop by a larger amount than the drop in the BPO owner's material's cost would drop. This is because the material costs of Inventors, who use more materials per run, will drop by a larger amount than the BPO owner's material costs will drop, and since inventors set the market, the price will drop by the amount that inventor's costs drop, not by the amount BPO owner's material costs drop.
Not having to invent is a convenience, since the invention costs are already figured into the final price, because supply is dominated by inventors. This is more than outweighed by the fact that a BPOs have a tiny production volume. Yes, Tech prices will drop slightly (Akita T did an analysis in another thread). That will benefit Inventors more than it will benefit BPO owners. Yes, they do, so material cost changes affect them less than Inventors. This means that they benefit less from material cost decreases than Inventors do. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |
|

Pipa Porto
462
|
Posted - 2012.07.22 23:38:00 -
[41] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Akita T wrote:The current T2 BPO cost of one unit is 100 mil ISK (out of which 50 mil technetium), while the invented unit costs 160 mil ISK (out of which 70 mil technetium) and the market price is 170 mil ISK. T2 BPO profit is 7 bil ISK/month, inventor profit per line is 0.6 bil, but can be scaled up to 6.6 bil ISK/month via multiple lines (and a lot more effort). Now, technetium price gets slashed in half. T2 BPO production costs fall to 75 mil ISK (out of which 25 mil tech) while invented units cost 125 mil ISK (35 mil technetium). The market price will most likely settle at around 135 mil ISK, maybe a tad bit higher. T2 BPO profit is now 6 bil ISK/month (1 bil ISK less), while the inventor profit remains the same or even goes up a little bit.
I already know profit for T2 BPO owner is bigger than for inventor. T2 BPO profit will go up after the buff. It can't drop if production costs drop and everything else stays the same.
Well, see, that's where you're an idiot. You're forgetting that this is a competitive market, so the end product price will drop. It will drop by more than the amount that the BPO owner's cost to manufacture will drop, reducing the BPO owner's profits.
Akita just showed you exactly how it works. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
462
|
Posted - 2012.07.23 01:20:00 -
[42] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Well, see, that's where you're an idiot. You're forgetting that this is a competitive market, so the end product price will drop. It will drop by more than the amount that the BPO owner's cost to manufacture will drop, reducing the BPO owner's profits.
Akita just showed you exactly how it works. Competitive market? Selling at a loss? What?
When did I say anyone would be selling at a loss? You're being intentionally (I hope) stupid by trying to suggest that I did.
The end product price will drop. That drop will be far larger than the drop in the BPO owner's manufacturing cost because the drop in final product price is determined by the drop in an Inventor's manufacturing cost. Akita T explained pretty clearly exactly how that works. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
475
|
Posted - 2012.07.24 09:58:00 -
[43] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Who cares if there were more than 2 traders just follow the transaction trail applying negative balances if needs be.
So create ISK out of nowhere on a massive scale. I thought that was what you were pissed about. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
485
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 00:54:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Ore Bunny wrote:true, but on the other hand who honestly cares about your baby-like moaning?
Oh nice... More T2 BPO owners. Hulk, Mackinaw and Skiff BPOs will be very good items to have. A lot of profit after Inferno 1.2 hits TQ. CCP should give more free T2 BPOs.
If you think they're so great, then buy one.
At the moment, a Hulk BPO earns about 3b in profit a month. (a Scimi BPO, which has a similar profit, is selling for ~190b or 290b). Even assuming the Hulk BPO is worth only 100b on the open market, 3% a month is a terrible return on your 100b ISK investment.
T2 BPOs have never been free. Stop drinking Kuvakei's Kool-Aide. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
487
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 07:15:00 -
[45] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:T2 BPOs have never been free. Stop drinking Kuvakei's Kool-Aide. Yes they were. Maybe some RP, but that has been easy, no effort income for years until CCP nerfed it recently.
1. Standings weren't as easy to grind then as they are now. 2. Research Agents didn't work the way they do now. 3. They weren't an income source during the Lottery, they were lottery tickets. 4. You don't seem to have any idea how the Lottery worked.
http://www.eve-wiki.net/index.php?title=BPC#Historical:_Blueprint_lottery "In the past, research points were like lottery tickets. So the more research points you had the bigger chance you had of getting some T2 BPO from your research agent. You got more research points for each mission if the skill that is necessary for doing missions was trained higher."
http://www.eve-wiki.net/index.php?title=Research_agents "Previously, the primary use for RPs was the GÇ£T2 lottery.GÇ¥ When CCP released a new GÇ£batchGÇ¥ of T2 BPOs, every GÇ£activeGÇ¥ research point in the lottery was a GÇ£ticketGÇ¥ into the lottery. The more tickets you had, the better chance you had to win a T2 BPO. There was some debate as to how the winner was chosen. Argue among yourselves. You lost all your RP when you accepted a BPO, and had to talk to the agent again and restart your research. You only lost the RP from the agent that made you the offer; others were not affected." EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
487
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 07:38:00 -
[46] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:1. Standings weren't as easy to grind then as they are now. Yes, they were easy to get. Pipa Porto wrote:2. Research Agents didn't work the way they do now. Go to agent -> accept research project and log off. It has been like that from beginning. Pipa Porto wrote:3. They weren't an income source during the Lottery, they were lottery tickets. And more alts you got more likely you got T2 BPOs. Pipa Porto wrote:4. You don't seem to have any idea how the Lottery worked. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrjwaqZfjIY
Again, nope, and not Relevant anyway. I'm tired of following you down every little tangent your addled mind takes you to in an attempt to keep the goalposts moving.
If they're too good and should be removed, why haven't you purchased one?
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=134122&find=unread 20b, Earns 255m Isk/Month profit if fed.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=136667&find=unread 7b, Earns 280m ISK/Month profit if fed.
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=135167&find=unread 13b, Loses 42m Isk/Month if fed.  EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
488
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 11:16:00 -
[47] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:He says he wants to purchase them with research points not isk. Anyway I call upon CCP to destroy tech 3 manufacture by seeding t3bpo's.
Anyone who defends t2bpo either has access to it's overpowered manufacturing ability or is just plain dumb.
CCP please ruin T3 by seeding T3BPO's. Please destroy Serenity server by dropping gifted items there too.
If they're Overpowered, why haven't you purchased any?
If you want to buy them with RP, go ahead and get in your time machine and do so. You'll be sad to find that that's not how the lottery worked. Anyway, the lottery's been over for 5 years. It's not relevant.
If they're so overpowered that they're ruining inventors, why are inventors making more Isk with less capital investment? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
488
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 11:29:00 -
[48] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:If you want to buy them with RP, go ahead and get in your time machine and do so. You'll be sad to find that that's not how the lottery worked. So, how it worked if RP wasn't any part of it?
1. Please, go to your Junior High English teacher and tell them that they badly failed you and that you would like remedial lessons in sentence parsing.
2. You did not buy BPOs with RP, each RP was a lottery ticket and if one of yours won, you had the option of accepting the offer (wiping your RP with the agent), or hoping for a better BPO.
3. Still not relevant unless you have a time machine. You and Brewlar have as yet shown nothing to suggest that T2 BPOs cause any trouble for Inventors or the game as a whole. You claim that they're overpowered, but when asked why you haven't gotten a piece of that sweet, sweet, overpowered Isk, you whine that you want CCP to give you a time machine instead. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
491
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 21:44:00 -
[49] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:1. Please, go to your Junior High English teacher and tell them that they badly failed you and that you would like remedial lessons in sentence parsing. English isn't the only language in the world. You do that just to move goalpost. We all know that you own T2 BPOs.
If I owned a T2 BPO, I'd have sold it already. Know why? Because they're terrible investments.
If you think T2 BPOs are overpowered at this point in time, why haven't you bought any? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
494
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 02:23:00 -
[50] - Quote
@Jorma and Brewlar,
If you think T2 BPOs are overpowered at this point in time, why haven't you bought any?
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=136821&find=unread 70b-120b, 700m ISK/Month profit if Fed. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |
|

Pipa Porto
498
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 06:23:00 -
[51] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Sentence parsing is a useful skill in any language. Oh... we have expert here.  I'd be ready to bet that you can't complete one single sentence in Finnish or Swedish
Give me a dictionary and a sentence structure guide, and I bet I could parse it.
Anyway, I learned Latin in school, and French at home, not Finnish or Swetish. Not everybody has to speak English, but learning how to figure out what sentences actually say is kind of important when speaking in any language.
Quote:Pipa Porto wrote:If I owned a T2 BPO, I'd have sold it already. Know why? Because they're terrible investments. If T2 BPOs are terrible investments then why do they still exists in-game? Obviously there's something good in them. - Profit - Owner dominates market.
Being terrible investments is not an argument to remove them. Titan and Supercap BPOs are terrible investments right now. No reason to remove those.
They're collectors items, and the premium that they command over their rational value is proof of that.
-They provide a terrible income for their capital investment. -They do no such thing. A Hulk BPO produces 30 Hulks a month. Jita alone consumes 2000+. HAG killed 9,000 in like 3 months. There are maybe 5-10 Hulk BPOs. That's at most 300 Hulks from BPOs a month when at least 3,000 a month were needed just for replacement.
Again, if T2 BPOs are so good, why haven't you bought one? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=134773&find=unread 17b, 38m Isk LOSS per month. (But wait, I thought they were overpowered and ruled the market?) EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
498
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 07:08:00 -
[52] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:-They provide a terrible income for their capital investment. -They do no such thing. A Hulk BPO produces 30 Hulks a month. Jita alone consumes 2000+. HAG killed 9,000 in like 3 months. There are maybe 5-10 Hulk BPOs. That's at most 300 Hulks from BPOs a month when at least 3,000 a month were needed just for replacement. What is better investment? Invention is one of the worst ways to earn isk.
You clearly have no idea how to do invention. You can pretty easily break 2m ISK/hr/line doing invention. You could use the Isk you would have invested in a T2 BPO on market manip. You could run a reaction farm. You could invest in collateralized loans (most pay ~5%-8%).
Quote:Why you link these terrible ones? There's better BPOs out there.
These are the ones currently on sale. I don't normally look for T2 BPO sales because I don't want one because I don't throw my money away on expensive collectors items).
I also linked the Scimitar BPO. That's one of the better ones (as it's also profitable to invent), and that makes ~3b a month and costs 290b.
That's a 1% monthly rate of return.
Copying Titan BPOs does better than that, and that market's crashed into the dirt. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
498
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 07:19:00 -
[53] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:You clearly have no idea how to do invention. You can pretty easily break 2m ISK/hr/line doing invention. I know how to do invention. Just not worth it. Nobody buys T2 BPCs. Or I would have to wait months to sell one.
That's because everyone does the smart thing with their invented BPCs so nobody bothers looking on contracts. You have to actually build the thing.
And again, all of those other things make a better return on investment than BPOs.
You know how big a reactor farm you could set up with the 290b Isk you'd otherwise have tied up in a Scimi BPO? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
501
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:19:00 -
[54] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:I sell you one for 15bn that I researched in 3 month, deal? not a troll!
Did you research it on NPC station? No, you didn't.
For the past page, you've been complaining that you can't make a profit when you take the least efficient path to build something POSSIBLE.
Here's how you invent Hulks profitably.
Buy a Stack of Covetor BPCs. Buy your invention materials. Invent all your BPCs. You now know how many Hulks you're gonna build. Buy that many Covetors. Buy the appropriate amount of componants (or build them). Build your Hulks.
PROFIT. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
501
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 13:43:00 -
[55] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Not anymore since now everyone knows...
Wow.
My god, what have I done. I've shared the ancient secret, passed down over generations, of buying things off the market. Whatever shall I do.
Anyway, when one item becomes unprofitable (or not profitable enough), switch to another item.
Inventors can do that, BPO owners can't. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
512
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 01:17:00 -
[56] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:46 pages later, and you guys are STILL feeding the trolls. Amazing.
It's pretty clear to me that both Jorma and Brewlar honestly believe what they're saying even after every point they've tried to make has been discredited. Which makes them fanatics, not trolls. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone |

Pipa Porto
536
|
Posted - 2012.07.27 18:41:00 -
[57] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Still waiting for CCP to destroy the T3 manufacture by seeding T3BPO's. After all ''BPO's have no market effect'' said by a douche at ccp, so why should they not seed more BPO's both t2 and t3?
CCP grow some balls and fix your mistakes other wise follow through with them. Don't just stop at being half a tard either go full on tard by seeding more BPO's for t2 and t3 or actually gain some intelligence and remove T2BPO's.
So, what you're saying is that you are no longer willing to address the points others have made and thus concede the argument. Gotcha.
/thread EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
849
|
Posted - 2012.09.01 04:35:00 -
[58] - Quote
Traedar wrote:You want a no risk, little effort, ISK-printing Mackinaw BPO? No.
That goes against everything Eve Online is about. In this way T2 BPOs are probably the worst feature in the game. Sorry, T2 BPO owners. With no other meaningful asset can you say "sorry this is mine and you can't have one like it, ever".
Exhumer BPOs come up for sale with some regularity.
If you want a risky (prices are volatile over the course of a month), medium effort (quite a lot of logistics and marketeering if you want to make any money), poor investment T2 BPO, you can buy it.
And they're all poor investments. The best ones make ~3b Isk a month and are worth over 150b Isk if you sell them. So to break even, you need to run it for over 50 months (that's not counting the opportunity cost of not using that manufacturing slot for invention). All the while, risking further enhancement to invention (reducing the relative value of a BPO) or price fluctuations (Hulk BPO owners probably aren't very happy right now). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
854
|
Posted - 2012.09.02 18:23:00 -
[59] - Quote
Traedar wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: BTW other T2 Ships (Hulk, Huginn, Scimitar etc.) with BPO`s are still profitable even when selling in Jita...im not making anything of these things anyway, but thanks for the advice
Yeah that's why I would love to be able to produce one of these from BPO. No risk, little effort income.
Just have to look back a couple pages to find the links to T2 BPO auctions. Including a Scimitar BPO, which sold for 525 Billion ISK. Assuming that you discount the cost of material inputs entirely, you make roughly 7.7 (call it 10) billion ISK per month, so you'd break even after 52 months, or 4 and a half years. Since moon goo you mine is not, in fact, free, your actual profit per month is something like 4 Billion ISK per month so you need to wait ~130 months to break even (that's almost 11 years, for those keeping score).
Now, you might say "well you got it free" or somesuch. Well, in that case, the smart thing to do is to sell the dang thing immediately because you can do much better things with 525 Billion ISK than sink it into something that, with a fair amount of effort to run efficiently, can earn you 4 Billion ISK a month.
And given the number of T2 BPOs that it is unprofitable to manufacture, and the possibility that, sometime in the next 11 years, CCP might do something to further change the balance between BPOs and Invention, owning a T2 BPO is a pretty risky venture. And again, it's a fair bit of effort if you actually want to make money off of it.
Quote:I think you're completely missing my point. I have no problem with trading stuff on market, forum, contracts, Chribba, etc.
My point is that with any item in the game I can work towards building or otherwise obtaining it without relying on getting it from someone who already has it (by hunting for the right officer spawn, by buying a BPO, by starting a factory job or putting up a POS, etc). For instance I can mine or make an alt and train him to help me mine. But I can never create a T2 BPO or create an alt to train him to make one.
If you are a collector, and want them for their rarity, then making new ones available hurts their rarity. If you are a producer, then you're goal isn't "use a T2 BPO," your goal is "Produce a T2 Item profitably." Invention works just fine for you. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
857
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 11:31:00 -
[60] - Quote
Oh look. He's back.
And still with no new arguments to patch the holes that've been ripped out of his original ones. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

Pipa Porto
857
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 12:09:00 -
[61] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Oh look. He's back.
And still with no new arguments to patch the holes that've been ripped out of his original ones. I like your post, and the previous 2 posts you have up there as you read up
I'm not sure what you're saying, but seeding new T2 BPOs will simply kill the market for invention, as described in detail earlier in the thread.
The idea to seed them in LS is novel on its face, but all you need to do is JF in, buy the BPO, then jump to a exit system where your Orca is ready. No fighting (except for the guys sitting on the undock to blap cyno ships) involved. So it's really no more risky than any LS logistics. Which means the proposal is the same as Brewlar's "T2 BPOs are unfair because they're expensive, so CCP should give me one seed them." EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
858
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 15:47:00 -
[62] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:I'm not sure what you're saying, but seeding new T2 BPOs will simply kill the market for invention T2 BPO owners killed invention years ago.
Stop lying, Jorma. We've repeatedly explained to you exactly how Invention is quite profitable for the vast majority of T2 markets. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 17:19:00 -
[63] - Quote
Round and round we go with the amazing head-injured Jorma Morkkis (seriously, letting a Concussion go for months without a Doctors examination isn't smart. Go to the hospital. Amnesia is a serious medical concern.)
Copying T2 BPOs is never, has never, and almost certainly will never be an issue because it takes longer and costs more than manufacturing straight off the BPO.
And invention sets the prices in the vast majority of markets. Not BPOs. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 17:44:00 -
[64] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Skeenal Raholan wrote:due to limited runs on the bpo BPCs: limited runs BPOs: unlimited runs
Look, he thinks he caught something.
Jorma, BPOs are limited in the number of runs they can produce per unit time. You brought up BPCs as a way around that limitation. We pointed out that you were dead wrong. Not recognizing the context of the sentence you quoted (when your comments were the context) is a sign that you have severe short term memory problems for which you should see a Doctor.
That's the advantage invention has over BPOs. With a given amount of Capital, you can fill far more factory slots using invention than you ever could with T2 BPOs. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 17:49:00 -
[65] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Round and round we go with the amazing head-injured Jorma Morkkis (seriously, letting a Concussion go for months without a Doctors examination isn't smart. Go to the hospital. Amnesia is a serious medical concern.)
Copying T2 BPOs is never, has never, and almost certainly will never be an issue because it takes longer and costs more than manufacturing straight off the BPO.
And invention sets the prices in the vast majority of markets. Not BPOs. I stand corrected, Yet again, apparently some one thinks there is no profit to be made in T2 BPO's but its all in Invention? So... lets take the logical step here...underpants...profit?
Where did I say T2 BPOs were not, on the whole, profitable? Quote and Link, please. (Yes, I'm going to treat your straw men the same way I treat Jorma's)
You need to pack your straw men better.
Not being the price setter does not mean that the T2 BPOs aren't profitable. They are, but, because most of the demand is filled by invented items, the price is set relative to inventors and their costs, not BPO owners and their costs. And despite the fact that their profit/unit is higher, they're still a terrible investment because of their insane valuation. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 17:51:00 -
[66] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:''Geez would CCP stop spamming me with all these worthless T2BPO's how can I possibly make profit from these gifted items with inventors under cutting me all the time?'' Never once said not even by X-BOB members.
Remove Invention T2 production should be for CCP's chosen players just like it originally was. Noobs don't deserve the ability to make T2. As for T3 what the **** where are the BPO's? get them out to pets ASAP!
If you're not going to address our rebuttals and are instead going to keep posting the same debunked shit and straw man arguments, get out.
By the way, didn't you promise that you were quitting in favor of EVE:Serenity? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 18:15:00 -
[67] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Skeenal Raholan wrote:Bpo = limited # of runs you can run per month, moron. Try to copy it next time...
And you end up manufacturing fewer items in that month. Good job. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 18:20:00 -
[68] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Yeah about that... the server was peaking at over 40k players which is higher than tranquillity which was nice but sadly it's kinda drifting off now. Also they make it kinda hard to pay. Also I'm happy to see this post get necro'd and I'm here just to throw petrol on the fire. Although to be fair T2BPO's glaring flaws does not really need any more fuel.
Also I'm 100% for T2BPO now.
T2BPO's are the best thing in game, if you don't have one tough **** you should have been around when CCP was chucking them to their mates for **** all. Actually lest than **** all, garbage is currently worth around 12 isk per unit. RP is worth less than that. Anyway if you want one your going to have to pay for it by buying plex or getting your ass onto Ebay where you can RMT one because there ain't no other way your getting it.
Your not ganking it because there is zero reason for a t2bpo to leave a station and your not stealing it because he magical BPO locks prevent you stealing them. Sure you can still use it though. CCP really ought to allow supercaps to be locked incase someone loses 1 in combat.
If you have any evidence that any T2 BPOs currently in the game were seeded improperly or otherwise acquired due to Dev misconduct, either post that evidence or send it to CCP's IA department.
As for your little fit about RP values, if you have the time machine needed to make that argument valid, I would suggest that there are better things you could use it for. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 18:21:00 -
[69] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:And you end up manufacturing fewer items in that month. Good job. That's why you have at least ten BPOs.
And now you're saying that it's worth tying say 5 Trillion ISK up in BPOs in order to make 40 billion ISK a month. (Scimitar BPOs)
There are any number of things you can do with 5 Trillion ISK that would earn far more than 40 billion ISK a month.
But then, we've been over this before. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 19:57:00 -
[70] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:And now you're saying that it's worth tying say 5 Trillion ISK up in BPOs in order to make 40 billion ISK a month. (Scimitar BPOs)
There are any number of things you can do with 5 Trillion ISK that would earn far more than 40 billion ISK a month. Those BPOs cost you exactly 0 isk. so 40 billion per month for 0 isk investment is quite good.
You can sell them for the 5 Trillion ISK and use that ISK for other things, which means that no matter how you got them, they're still worth 5 Trillion ISk.
It's called "Opportunity Cost." Look it up. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 19:58:00 -
[71] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Skeenal Raholan wrote:Isn't there a limited number of each type of t2bpo in game (thought I read 3 of each max). So yeah For example there's 20-25 Scimi BPOs left in the game. There was around 200 but most of them burned in wrecks or something weird happened to them.
Do you have a source for this information, or are you lying again? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 20:15:00 -
[72] - Quote
Traedar wrote:I'll fly a different ship or use a different tower, and get similar or more benefits. There are enough alternatives. However, if I want to produce T2 without the hassle of invention then there is no way for me to create a T2 BPO.
If you want to produce a T2 Item, you can invent it. Invention is the alternative to a BPO that has similar benefits (you create a T2 item).
Faction towers take less effort to run and run more efficiently than regular towers, T2 BPOs take less effort to run and run more efficiently than Invention.
If you're lazy and want that ease of use and efficiency (that's really not that much easier than Invention, especially in cases of fluctuating markets, where good market awareness might be the only thing to keep you in the black, while an inventor can simply switch away from the volatile market), T2 BPOs go on sale pretty regularly. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
859
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 20:24:00 -
[73] - Quote
Traedar wrote:Fine, I'll clarify. They are limited and if you want to collect them then you can because there won't be any more (as they exist today). However, they have a real purpose isn't duplicated by any other item: to create T2 without the invention process and make a ton of ISK while doing so. So they have unique purpose in the game other than being collected.
Then tell me, what rationale besides "It's a collectors item" do you have for a Scimitar BPO (which earns about 4b a month) being valued by the market (as in, this is what it sold for) at half a Trillion ISK? And how is making a .7% monthly return on an investment "making a ton of ISK?"
And I could say that about faction Towers. Their ability to last longer without being refueled isn't duplicated by any other tower. And their fuel savings make a ton of ISK while being convenient in that way. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
860
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 23:18:00 -
[74] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:And now you're saying that it's worth tying say 5 Trillion ISK up in BPOs in order to make 40 billion ISK a month. (Scimitar BPOs)
There are any number of things you can do with 5 Trillion ISK that would earn far more than 40 billion ISK a month. Those BPOs cost you exactly 0 isk. so 40 billion per month for 0 isk investment is quite good. Said a thousand times over they won't admit it. T2BPO ROI is off the charts. If we take a value of RP invested into the ''lottery'' and we look at the value of the T2BPO's dished out. If the lottery was fair (it wasn't) and it sunk more isk than it dealt out then we would not have a problem with T2BPO's. The return in investment is phenomenal. The original investment for a T2BPO was nothing and that nothing could become an instant 600 billion along side a guaranteed 5 billion isk risk free per month on the very best blue prints. CCP completely de-legitimised the EVE economy by gifting content that completely over valued the effort required to obtain it. Untill T2BPO's are removed from the game the EVE online economy will be nothing but a sham and to call it player driver is slanderous and false advertising. CCP controls the eve economy through gifts to players.
You have a very odd definition of Instant, since that Scimitar BPO couldn't have spawned any time later than 5 years ago.
5 years is instant. Brewlar Kuvakei, everyone!
Oh, and the ROI is only at all worthwhile if you don't understand opportunity cost. (And possibly have a time machine.) EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
860
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 23:48:00 -
[75] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:The cost of opportunity was nothing you dip ****. All you had to do was enter a lottery. A lottery that had no place existing as it was gifting items without taking any equal capital in return. Such a lottery could only exist in a fictional economy such as EVE's. Anyone who says the eve economy is player driven or realistic is wrong for this reason.
CCP controls the eve economy and until they remove T2BPO's that will always be the case. As long as T2BPO's remain CCP has no right to call the eve realistic. It is purely a fabrication driven by them.
Nope. You had to win the lottery. And even then, there was a good chance of getting a ****** BPO.
The lottery was meant to represent the vagaries of scientific research. There are plenty of people who invent something new and get rich off of it. That's what the lottery was meant to represent.
But enough about the game mechanics of 5 years ago. To make an argument for removing T2 BPOs from the game, you either need to make a case for the availability of Time Travel or for T2 BPOs causing actual harm to the game now, not 5 years ago.
You've failed on both counts. You've failed on the second count repeatedly. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
860
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 23:55:00 -
[76] - Quote
Traedar wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Faction towers take less effort to run and run more efficiently than regular towers, T2 BPOs take less effort to run and run more efficiently than Invention. A tower's function is to run reacton, moon harvest, research BPO, etc. Any tower can do this. So a faction tower uses 10% less fuel? You're comparing this to a T2 BPO bypassing the costs and effort of invention? With a T2 BPO, you can build off it using 1 hr of effort per month saving plenty of cost and logistics compared to invention (invest in T1 BPO, tower, make BPC, buy datacore, decryptor).
A T2 BPO's function is to create a T2 Item. Invention can also do this. So a T2 BPO uses a little less effort then invention, just like a Faction tower takes a little less effort to run. So a T2 BPO consumes a little less ISK in production, just like a Faction tower takes a little less ISK to run.
Just like if you want the convenience of a faction tower, you have to buy one from another player, if you want the convenience (and terrible ROI) of a T2 BPO, you have to buy one from a player.
An unlimited seed of T2 BPOs would simply destroy the invention profession, and in the process make T2 manufacturing about as profitable as T1 manufacturing.
Just because you want something but are too cheap to pay market value for it doesn't mean it's CCP's duty to provide it to you. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
860
|
Posted - 2012.09.03 23:56:00 -
[77] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:Vigilant wrote:Back to the point, CCP is not removing them. If you want a direct answer just show up to the next even (EVE Vegas) and ask.
I sure as hell will, and I will ask them to restart the "lottery" and give us more t2 BPO's. It's time to make R&D points worth something, and datacores are just nice to have.
What about all the future dust players who may want to partake in eve online and the T2 lottery? How are they going to fare against the established community, this is why the T2 situation needs to be looked into, remove not remove, just made fair, and theftable/scamable. this is EvE. Id like to see the numbers swell to 100K online on the servers one day, that would be much better then looking at the few grappling on to their precious. Deal with IT.
They'll be able to manufacture T2 items and profit from it just fine once their shiny new EVE toons get their science training done. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
861
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 00:08:00 -
[78] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:They cant profit from their shiny new BPO's they cant whoopsie from some ones corp hanger now can they.
Remove the ability to lock down BPOs and everyone's manufacturing alt will be in a one man corp. Industrial "Corps" will simply be chat channels. CEO's who want to help their newer industrialists by providing access to spare BPOs won't be able to do so.
Sounds like a grand improvement.
(Oh, and not everyone locks down their expensive BPO collection.) EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
862
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 00:20:00 -
[79] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Kara Books wrote:They cant profit from their shiny new BPO's they cant whoopsie from some ones corp hanger now can they. Remove the ability to lock down BPOs and everyone's manufacturing alt will be in a one man corp. Industrial "Corps" will simply be chat channels. CEO's who want to help their newer industrialists by providing access to spare BPOs won't be able to do so. Sounds like a grand improvement. (Oh, and not everyone locks down their expensive BPO collection.) Im glad we can agree on something. Oh and, Why again are these CEO's Teaching "Newer Industrialists" how to make T2 items NOT from invention? I could have swore some one said that was more profitable. Unlocking Blueprints just makes the Original owner, not collect passive ISK while their watching a "LazyTown Marathon" thats quite possibly another form of Passive ISK.
So, you're proposing that only T2 BPOs can't be locked down? That's kind of an odd distinction, isn't it?
Invention is less profitable per unit, but much more lucrative due to the much higher volumes you can produce. For any given amount of capital, you can make much, much, much more ISK through Invention than you can through T2 BPOs. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
862
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 00:38:00 -
[80] - Quote
Vigilant wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Dam straight T2BPO owners should be driven into one man corps if they want to play with CCP isk welfare. Then they can be war dec'd on a daily basis so people can smash **** out of their posses.
CCP remove T2BPO let eve grow. Removing them without fixing the -4/-4 normal invention doesn't fix the problem. You will just drive cost up on everyone, minus the Alliances and they how corner certain markets. CCP would have to make invent BPC's somehow researchable, and that would have to be able to done by anyone and any security system. Pick which side of the coin you want? Alliances running BPO's or running invention folks to the rules they make. They have the capital to screw either side of the coin. CCP will not remove that...
BPO's do not affect the sale price of most T2 items. The only T2 items that BPOs affect are ones who's sales volumes are so low that the BPOs can actually fill the demand (which means, like BLOPS [which have no BPOs], they wouldn't be worth inventing anyway).
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Dam straight T2BPO owners should be driven into one man corps if they want to play with CCP isk welfare. Then they can be war dec'd on a daily basis so people can smash **** out of their posses.
CCP remove T2BPO let eve grow.
You can wardec the corps with T2 BPOs now. Nothing's stopping you.
Show how an item that is regularly available on the market, that has a horrible ROI, and that cannot be easily shifted in the face of changing market conditions is "CCP ISK Welfare." EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

Pipa Porto
863
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 07:50:00 -
[81] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Horrible ROI for new players. Astronomical ROI for players who were gifted them. Can you please stop making out that T2BPO's somehow cost their owners massive amounts of effort or isk as it's simply not the case. If it did take massive amounts of effort or ISK then T2BPO would not be a problem. Unfortunately T2BPO is a problem and a huge flaw in EVE that needs solved if the game is to grow.
You still clearly don't understand the concept of opportunity cost. Nor the concept of a time value of money.
Unless you are claiming that T2 BPO owners have access to time machines, the value of the BPO today and the value of the BPO 5 years ago are not interchangeable.
And getting yourself in a position where winning the lottery with a worthwhile BPO was at all likely was a pretty monumental effort at the time.
Again you claim that the game won't grow due to T2 BPOs. That's demonstrably false. The current subcount is roughly double what it was when the lottery ended 5 years ago. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
863
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 08:57:00 -
[82] - Quote
Azrael Dinn wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote: Can you please stop making out that T2BPO's somehow cost their owners massive amounts of effort or isk as it's simply not the case calm down little warrior, the huge majority of T2 BPO`s beeing used right now, did cost their owner a massive amount of isk OR they are the original owners and were smart and lucky enough to invest their RP to the right time into the right thing (like me  ). This has absolutely nothing to do with with beeing "gifted" and even you probably know that. Its not a donation if you hand something out that the oposite has paid for (in form of a lottery ticket for exmaple). Just try to understand what Lottery means: And everyone also knows that some parts of the lottery was fixed which means some person where gifted with t2 bpos. Most of them where in BoB back then which was the power house of that era in eve.
Got any evidence that any BPOs that were unfairly given out are still in the game?
The BPOs involved in the T20 mess were removed more than 5 years ago. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
863
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 10:11:00 -
[83] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:What does WWII tank has to do with EVE?
Stop trolling.
Quote: And no, lottery hasn't changed in last 5 years.
Jorma Morkkis: "Removing something isn't a change." EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
863
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 10:30:00 -
[84] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:What does WWII tank has to do with EVE? Stop trolling. Quote: And no, lottery hasn't changed in last 5 years.
Jorma Morkkis: "Removing something isn't a change." It's a change. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lottery
Selective quoting just makes you look dumber.
At this point I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
865
|
Posted - 2012.09.04 22:55:00 -
[85] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:I was looking forward to doing T2 industry and even though select t2 fields are open to noobs where demand surpasses T2BPO production numbers I choose not to engage in the activity. I don't see why I should be offered the scraps while CCP has selected a player to have first pickings and a monopoly over that item.
I do however produce T2 rigs and other items where CCP has not given a chosen player the ability to out perform noobs. Yet I still hope CCP introduces BPO's for rigs and for T3. As all of you lot are saying T2BPO's don't harm the game what so ever and are all round amazing so please CCP seed T3 BPO's and rig BPO's because as you can see they are great just ask idiots such as shar'ra matcevsovski . She'll explain why gifted BPO's are great for the game.
1. Most T2 items have demands that far outstrip the capacity of their BPOs.
2. So you want CCP to remove T2 BPOs from some items, but add them for others? What kind of strawman are you building up to now?
3. Ah. There's the straw filled payoff. Something not being a problem does not mean that adding more of that something is a good idea.
4. You still don't seem to understand the concept of a lottery.
The existence and use of T2 BPOs don't cause any significant economic problems for inventors. Do you have any evidence to suggest otherwise (or evidence of the existence of a time machine)? Do you have any evidence to support your bizarre claim that T2 BPOs drive new players away from the game? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
866
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 08:51:00 -
[86] - Quote
Traedar wrote:I think a system could work where invention would be "newb" T2 production with low barrier to entry and then vets would be able to buy expensive T2 BPOs from NPCs just like any other BPO is available from NPCs. The prices on them could be relatively high compared to build cost.
That would be fine until T2 BPOs reached the saturation point, then the bottom would fall out from invention.
Look at the Supercap and Titan BPC markets. A Titan BPC used to sell for about 20b so everyone and their brother who could afford to bought Titan BPOs for copying and now they sell for ~4b. The decline happened effectively overnight as the number of BPCs available reached and exceeded the demand for them.
Seed unlimited new T2 BPOs and people will buy them and knock the bottom out of the Invention market. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
866
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 14:19:00 -
[87] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:because we would like to but on fair terms, [we] the 99%
You can acquire a T2 BPO the same way most of the current owners acquired them.
You can also make more ISK with any given amount of Capital through Invention than through BPO ownership (meaning that, no matter how you acquired the BPO, selling it and switching to invention will result in a higher income).
What's unfair about a process whose only significant effect is reducing the cost of flying niche ships and fitting niche modules? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
867
|
Posted - 2012.09.05 22:39:00 -
[88] - Quote
Kara Books wrote:as for the original owners, I dont think they would be hurt much, as their obviously profitless 600B T2 BPO's would be unprofitable either way.
You keep saying that like anyone's claimed that T2 BPOs don't provide a profit to their owners.
As to your idea, I think you vastly underestimate the size of EVE's industrial sector.
Seeding BPOs is a nerf to invention, removing BPOs is (you claim) a buff to invention. Why do you want to nerf invention at the same time you want to buff it?
Seeding BPOs would simply raise the minimum demand for invention controlled prices. Seeding BPOs the way you propose would raise the minimum demand more in the most in-demand items, resulting in a likely oversupply of BPOs, permanently crippling invention one item at a time. This would mean that, far from helping newbies, eventually invention would become the province of the rich industrialist trying to get a BPO in an underserved market (and likely not making any money on the BPCs he's inventing). EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
876
|
Posted - 2012.09.06 22:30:00 -
[89] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Giving inventions a 100 100 stat instead of a -10 -10 would be a great solution to the problem. It may destroy margins in some markets but it would open the playing field to all industrialists of EVE and not those players CCP chose to produce T2 or those players who purchased the right via BPO.
That would not change the profitability of invention. It would also make most decryptors effectively worthless.
And once again, you've failed miserably at showing any shred of evidence to suggest that the current situation of BPOs has any effect on the profitability or accessibility of invention as a profession. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
881
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 13:34:00 -
[90] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Buff invention and make T2BPO's irrelevant. That way T2BPO owners could not complain as there BPO's have not been touched.
You also don't seem to understand the concept of a zero sum game.
The More You Don't KnowGäó EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

Pipa Porto
881
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 13:53:00 -
[91] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:All those who speak out against the dumbfuckery that is T2BPO along the years are my alts.
Glad you finally admitted it.
Quote:If present counts stand I have over 1000 accounts so CCP hey up remove T2BPO before you lose 1/30th of your player base.
1,000/350,000=1/30
Glad to hear it, Brewlar.
Oh and, [citation needed] on the "1000 people have spoken out against T2 BPOs." EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
881
|
Posted - 2012.09.07 13:57:00 -
[92] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Horrible ROI for new players. Astronomical ROI for players who were gifted them. Can you please stop making out that T2BPO's somehow cost their owners massive amounts of effort or isk as it's simply not the case. A significant portion of useful T2 BPOs have changed hands for ISK, as opposed to still being in the original hands. So, actually, yes, a good number of T2 BPOs did cost their current owners a lot of ISK.
Even if the BPOs were in their original owner's hands, the fact that they have a market price and can be sold means that holding on to one incurs an opportunity cost equal to the item's sale value, which means that the method of acquisition isn't relevant, it's still (from a profit standpoint) far better to sell the BPO and invest your ISK elsewhere. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
884
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 05:09:00 -
[93] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Where are all these people I only ever see 29k to 32k except my 1k on at any one time? I think you're over estimating EVE's player base. Weekend numbers rarely rise over 35k at peak time nowadays.
So you're saying that the majority of players are logged on 24/7? Ooookay...
By the way, according to the QEN, EVE had 357,000 active accounts at the end of 2010. That stagnated some, fell a bit (Incarna), and has pretty much recovered.
Tell me more about how your 1,000 accounts represent 1/30th of EVE's 350,000 subscriptions.
And tell me more about how there have been 1,000 different active characters arguing for the removal of T2 BPOs. Feel free to list them. Since you already counted them, I'm sure listing them will be trivial. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
884
|
Posted - 2012.09.08 14:07:00 -
[94] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:Good point. release a T2BPO winners list so we can see which players and corporations had the T2BPO's dished out to. After all it was a lottery and all players deserve to see a winners list.
Oh CCP is not going to publish the list? Then I call corruption. The lottery was corrupt and CCP simply chose which players to give the best T2BPO's to and until a winners list is published my call of corruption is relevant. The only difference with T20 Vincent was that he got caught.
Do you have any evidence to suggest that such a list would fruitfully produce evidence of corruption, or is it simply a fishing expedition? You're making the accusation. It's up to you to provide evidence to get an investigation started.
Regardless, even if BPOs were seeded unfairly, the origins of the BPOs is not relevant to their current economic importance (and lack thereof) unless you have a time machine, so they're irrelevant to the question of whether they need to be removed.
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Was T20 a tank?
Or was it fictional character created by someone?
This is just getting sad. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
891
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 01:00:00 -
[95] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:No one has a problem with unique ships. Unique ships don't stop me undocking in my regular ships, T2BPO does however rule out complete areas of T2 manufacture.
If CCP gave a selected few players a special ship that insta'd titans and was indestructible we'd call this a game imbalance, such an imbalance exists in regards to T2 manufacture.
The only people here who are bad at math are CCP. They gave out content who's value far exceeded any effort put into the game to achieve or acquire, they then stoped giving out this content. That is the worse math this game has seen and yet CCP have failed to correct this error and simply allows the error to multiply and compound with each passing day.
Nope. Name one instance where all the markets related to a science skill are dominated by BPO manufacture. If you can't, then no area of T2 manufacture is dominated by BPO manufacture. Specific markets may be, but invention is all about following the market anyway.
No, it doesn't.
So now you want CCP to keep seeding T2 BPOs? Which is it? Are they overpowered and in need of removal, or are they [something] and in need of extra seeding? You gotta limit yourself to swinging the bat in one direction at a time man. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
892
|
Posted - 2012.09.11 03:37:00 -
[96] - Quote
Ginger Barbarella wrote:Why are you still arguing with this troll after all these pages?? 
Fanatics and Trolls are different beasts. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
917
|
Posted - 2012.09.12 20:58:00 -
[97] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Forcing other players to stop T2 manufacturing would be good. T2 BPO owners should be allowed to control T2 market.
You're just talking to make noise now, aren't you?
Where has anyone, besides you and Brewlar, suggested that? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
925
|
Posted - 2012.09.13 07:06:00 -
[98] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:I've heard that trying to do everything is bad for profit. Produce or sell, not both.
wat
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Point T2 BPO owners are making in this thread is that they want to get rid off inventors, because inventors lower their possible profit.
Where has anybody in this thread* said that? Quote and Link.
*aside from you and Brewlar in sad attempts at setting up straw men to argue against EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
925
|
Posted - 2012.09.13 07:42:00 -
[99] - Quote
Akita T wrote:Well, the troll has a sliver of truth tacked on to the end of his ranting, inventors do limit T2 BPO owners' possible profits in any of the reasonably high traffic markets (they limit it amongst themselves for low-traffic markets).
Yes, Jorma did stumble onto the tautological truth that "Monopoly holders benefit from strengthened monopolies."
But, as you point out later in your post, that's not what I asked. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
938
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 02:18:00 -
[100] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Akita T wrote:Well, the troll has a sliver of truth tacked on to the end of his ranting, inventors do limit T2 BPO owners' possible profits in any of the reasonably high traffic markets (they limit it amongst themselves for low-traffic markets). Yes, Jorma did stumble onto the tautological truth that "Monopoly holders benefit from strengthened monopolies." But, as you point out later in your post, that's not what I asked. Exactly. Monopoly is always good for everyone. Even RL has proved that: nothing can compete against Microsoft.
First, learn to read. First rule of reading: The whole sentence is important.
Second, ever going to post a quote and link to back up your bizzarre claims?
Pipa Porto wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Point T2 BPO owners are making in this thread is that they want to get rid off inventors, because inventors lower their possible profit. Where has anybody in this thread* said that? Quote and Link. *aside from you and Brewlar in sad attempts at setting up straw men to argue against
If not, stop lying. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|

Pipa Porto
938
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 07:54:00 -
[101] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:You used word "monopoly" without knowing what it means.
No, I didn't.
Ever going to post a quote and link to back up your bizzarre claims?
Pipa Porto wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Point T2 BPO owners are making in this thread is that they want to get rid off inventors, because inventors lower their possible profit. Where has anybody in this thread* said that? Quote and Link. *aside from you and Brewlar in sad attempts at setting up straw men to argue against
Where's the quote and link, Jorma? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
938
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 08:22:00 -
[102] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:No, I didn't. Then you should know that it's better for you as T2 BPO owner. Have you actually read this thread?
Context. It matters.
Ever going to post a quote and link to back up your bizzarre claims?
Pipa Porto wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote:Point T2 BPO owners are making in this thread is that they want to get rid off inventors, because inventors lower their possible profit. Where has anybody in this thread* said that? Quote and Link. *aside from you and Brewlar in sad attempts at setting up straw men to argue against
Where's the quote and link, Jorma? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
938
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 08:29:00 -
[103] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Ever going to post a quote and link to back up your bizzarre claims? Have you actually read this thread?
Yes, I have.
Where did anyone besides you or Brewlar say:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Point T2 BPO owners are making in this thread is that they want to get rid off inventors, because inventors lower their possible profit. in this thread? Quote and Link.
Heck, I'll make this easier on you. Show that someone of substance said
Jorma Morkkis wrote:they want to get rid off inventors
You're making the claim. Why aren't you willing to show the basis for that claim? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
939
|
Posted - 2012.09.15 18:18:00 -
[104] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:Akita T wrote:And why exactly would CCP add back something they explicitly said they wanted to remove (the monopoly on T2 production) and did so equally explicitly by adding invention ? Currently profit you as T2 BPO owner get from your investment is very small. That should be fixed. And because we are in cold and harsh universe cap between elite players and lesser players should be bigger.
Either you're trying (and horribly failing) to set up a straw man, or you've changed your mind in the most absurd way.
Either way, you need help.
The breaking of the BPO bottleneck of T2 production was intentional. Leaving BPOs in place to provide a baseline supply of uncommon items was equally intentional.
Quote and Link where anyone of substance has suggested removing Invention or Buffing BPOs. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
946
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 21:34:00 -
[105] - Quote
Jorma Morkkis wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote:Jorma Morkkis wrote: Elite players: players who get info about upcoming changes 2-3 months before everyone else so they can adapt.
you just had to read forums to know that...I know, its a bit more complicated than posting as there is no "read" button, but thats why we are elite player and you are just a newbie. No info about barge changes in February/March on forums...
If you have any evidence to suggest that players were told of upcoming changes inappropriately, I'm sure CCP would love to hear about it in an email to [email protected]
Otherwise, stop lying, and how in the world do your paranoid theories about mining barges have any bearing on the issue of T2 BPOs? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
946
|
Posted - 2012.09.16 21:36:00 -
[106] - Quote
Zelda Wei wrote:Akita T wrote:And why exactly would CCP add back something they explicitly said they wanted to remove (the monopoly on T2 production) and did so equally explicitly by adding invention ? It's only a monopoly because they closed the lottery.
That's so strange. I could have sworn my Alt was creating T2 items identical to those produced by BPOs without access to any T2 BPO. Was I creating fake merchandise?
Anyone want to buy knockoff T2 Invulns? EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
972
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 23:33:00 -
[107] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:shar'ra matcevsovski wrote: Are the products made from BPO`s any different to Invention-made products?- No.
Sadly yes, they are produced at a fraction of the cost as they don't require any invention costs such as data cores, t1 copying and decryptors. It is true that the T2BPO's required research points to obtain but the number was so unbelievably small for what the T2bpo is worth it's not even worth factoring. T2BPO's also have a much higher ME an P than the invented copies which have -10 -10. A buff to invention so that inventions have 100 100 ME and P would be a welcome nerf to T2BPO's.
Stop lying. Most (if not all) blueprints have a base invented ME/PE of -4/-4. You can't even get the basic mechanics right.
Second, if you think the products made from BPOs are different than those made from invention, show me how to distinguish between a T2 item built from a BPO and one built through invention. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |

Pipa Porto
987
|
Posted - 2012.09.21 18:21:00 -
[108] - Quote
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:On that note I'm going to stop posting here again and let the thread slide down the list until it gets necro'd by some one else discovering the crap T2BPO situation for the first time. I should really have put this thread in the eve general where it could easily have got 500 pages by now.
The part where Brewlar admit's it's all about the attention whoring.
Brewlar Kuvakei wrote:''Stop lying'' so T2BPO and inventions have the same M and P efficiency? Well good to know we can close this thread now and that CCP has finally fixed it's most terrible mistake after all these years . Hint, hint CCP, fix T2BPO bring invented T2 BPC's up to spec with regards to M & P efficiency.'
Reading is helpful if you want to understand things. You claimed that invented BPCs had an ME/PE of -10/-10. That's a lie. EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
|
|
|